Skip to content
Practice cases
Public ServicesIntermediate

1-2-4-All: applied decision

Move from solo thought to pairs, fours and plenary to widen participation before synthesis.

30 minutes

Scenario

A city planning workshop on bus route changes has sixty participants. A few officials dominate while night-shift riders are quiet.

Your role
Decision owner with responsibility for affected people
Method
1-2-4-All

Evidence pack

e1

Situation

A city planning workshop on bus route changes has sixty participants. A few officials dominate while night-shift riders are quiet.

e2

Method constraint

Treating airtime as equal influence or using plenary synthesis to erase minority harm.

Constraints

  • State assumptions and protect affected people.
  • Do not treat the method artifact as causal proof.

Case steps

Work through each prompt using the evidence pack. These guided cases support self-directed practice; server-scored attempts are not available yet.

1
Open Response

Frame the decision and identify the affected actors and evidence gaps.

2
Open Response

Apply the method to compare at least two interpretations or responses.

3
Open Response

Choose one bounded next test, its owner, safeguard and rejection signal.