Skip to content
Practice cases
Public ServicesIntermediate

RICE Prioritization: applied decision

Compare competing Mars settlement proposals without hiding weak estimates or rights concerns.

30 minutes

Scenario

A public health product team must choose between a wide-reaching reminder feature and a smaller accessibility repair needed by high-risk patients.

Your role
Decision owner with responsibility for affected people
Method
RICE Prioritization

Evidence pack

e1

Situation

A public health product team must choose between a wide-reaching reminder feature and a smaller accessibility repair needed by high-risk patients.

e2

Method constraint

Treating a precise score as objective truth or letting a small population's rights disappear in an average.

Constraints

  • State assumptions and protect affected people.
  • Do not treat the method artifact as causal proof.

Case steps

Work through each prompt using the evidence pack. These guided cases support self-directed practice; server-scored attempts are not available yet.

1
Open Response

Frame the decision and identify the affected actors and evidence gaps.

2
Open Response

Apply the method to compare at least two interpretations or responses.

3
Open Response

Choose one bounded next test, its owner, safeguard and rejection signal.