Skip to content
Practice cases
Public ServicesIntermediate

EventStorming: applied decision

Discover a domain process collaboratively by arranging meaningful events in time.

30 minutes

Scenario

A food-delivery platform believes refunds start with customer complaints, but warehouse staff report that stock substitutions occur before the customer is notified.

Your role
Decision owner with responsibility for affected people
Method
EventStorming

Evidence pack

e1

Situation

A food-delivery platform believes refunds start with customer complaints, but warehouse staff report that stock substitutions occur before the customer is notified.

e2

Method constraint

Turning the workshop into a software architecture debate before participants agree on what happens.

Constraints

  • State assumptions and protect affected people.
  • Do not treat the method artifact as causal proof.

Case steps

Work through each prompt using the evidence pack. These guided cases support self-directed practice; server-scored attempts are not available yet.

1
Open Response

Frame the decision and identify the affected actors and evidence gaps.

2
Open Response

Apply the method to compare at least two interpretations or responses.

3
Open Response

Choose one bounded next test, its owner, safeguard and rejection signal.