Skip to content
Better Decision Making
Module 8 of 9

Premortem: Make Dissent Usable Before Launch

17 minutes · intermediate

Learning objective

Use prospective hindsight and independent generation to surface failure mechanisms, then qualify them with evidence and convert them into owned decisions.

Why it matters

Once a team publicly supports a plan, ordinary review rewards confirmation. Assuming the failure has occurred gives participants temporary permission to explain it. Silent generation protects distinct information from anchoring.

Core concept: elicitation is only the first half

The session exercise produces candidate mechanisms. The full method tests evidence, prioritises consequence and time to act, and assigns changes, tests, protections or authorised acceptance.

Scenario

A portal team lists “suppliers resist change.” Interviews instead show that the smallest suppliers lack compatible identity credentials.

Worked decision

Replace the attitude label with a mechanism: credential requirements block a defined supplier segment, which returns to unmanaged email. Test the segment, design an authorised alternative and set a launch threshold.

Decision rule

A Premortem item is actionable only when it states a mechanism, evidence or uncertainty, consequence, response, owner and decision trigger.

AI lens

AI can cluster notes after independent generation. It must not simulate dissent, expose authorship or convert mention frequency into probability.

Quick check

Why write silently before discussion?

A. To avoid all collaboration.
B. To preserve independent knowledge before hierarchy and anchoring shape the list.
C. To estimate probability.
D. To assign blame privately.

Answer: B.

Next step

Run the Premortem exercise, transfer the outputs into the workspace and complete the supplier portal case.

Next step

Cynefin: Match the Response to the Context

Continue